I'm struggling with whether consistency is challenged by using "literal:" as the default in templates, and "ognl:" as the default elsewhere.
On 7/27/05, Jamie Orchard-Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is my main feeling about why I would prefer literal in HTML > templates. > > If it comes down to a vote for all literal or all ognl in both > templates and specs, then I'll go with all *literal*. > > Jamie > > > On Jul 27, 2005, at 2:04 AM, Nick Westgate wrote: > > > Plain HTML tag attributes are literal, so why should the > > component tag attributes in HTML be any different? > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
