Le mardi 26 juillet 2005 à 23:42 -0400, Nathan Kopp a écrit :
> "Viktor Szathmary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
> > If in doubt, go with a stricter and more consistent approach.. The
> > migration path from that to something with more "magic" is feasible,
> > but not the other way around. Making the "magic" go away will be more
> > painful on users.
> 
> Would people complain about the prefixes as much if they were shorter?  For
> example, in the JSP world nobody liked typing "bean:" in front of all the
> bean tags, but fewer people complain about "c:" prefix in the core JSTL
> tags.  Maybe single-character aliases for the prefixes would be a way to
> offset the annoyance of always having to specify the binding type.  Just a
> thought.

excellent if we can override the defaults in tapestry namespaces
(libraries and webapps).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to