On 7/29/05, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Listen, I know this is OSS and not a shop with hard > deadlines/requirements/deliverables. The point is that many users > *are* working in shops with hard deadlines/requirements/deliverables. > I field questions and sometimes less than favorable comments about how > Tapestry is a moving target. Breaking changes like this introduced > over a year after dev started and hopefully weeks before release do > not make it easier to be the Tapestry evangelist over here.
Well, i don't want to dig into technical discussion with the framework itself since I'm too new to it, i wish to give my experience and my impression as a new comer to Tapestry world. OSS development model or not having to deal with a moving target as a base framework for your own job in a business world is definitely not a good thing (TM) I'm one who wish to see a short/medium/long term target needed for the next generations of Tapestry, i mean not in a time manners but in feature and development conditions. Fixed the requirements delve into more techinical deep affair like API Ciao -- Massimo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
