I have never used it either. So +1 to remove. -Harish
On 8/18/05, Adam Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have never found a use for it, as we can plainly see, it causes a great > deal of confusion and problems. I say remove it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Howard Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tapestry development" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:14 PM > Subject: [DISCUSS] Deprecate the action service > > > I just saw another spat of user problems related to use of the action > service. I say "use", not "misuse" because, in my opinion, it can't be > used correctly. The clever tricks for maintaining client and server > synchronization that have evolved in Tapestry 2.x - 4.0 just aren't > possible with the action service. > > I would very much like to deprecate the action service and the > ActionLink component. Who out there is using it and why? > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
