Yeah, I think I might have been fud-ing the JavaSVN extension before. Speaking before I think again...What I meant to say was, using subclipse with the "command line (beta)" option, vs the native javahl extension is slow and uncomforatable...The JavaSVN extension does seem to do very well indeed..
Thanks for adding the correction, I'll try and validate my thoughts a little more before steering people in wrong directions... jesse On 8/26/05, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > > > subclipse works very well, with a catch if you're running on linux... > > > > If you are on linux you have to have the svn client installed on your > > system, ~with~ the javahl extensions if you want it to run properly. > > That means downloading the svn client source and re-compiling with the > > ./configure --with-javahl (or something like that) to get it. > > Just to qualify this a bit more, the catch exists for anything non- > Windows. On MacOS X, I use that Metissian SVN binaries which install > the javahl bindings. > > With that said, although Jesse has had problems, I've found the > JavaSVN extension for Subclipse works pretty well. > > -- > Kevin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
