[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-603?page=comments#action_12320255 ]
Ron Piterman commented on TAPESTRY-603: --------------------------------------- I meant something else. If a component defined *inside* another component is taking the "id" parameter, or one wishes to set the Id attribute of an html element, than one can not do so using annotations: currently: ====== @Component(type="PageLink", id="MyLink", page="MyPage") public abstract PageLink getLinkMyPage(); The id= refers to the jwcid, not the id attribute of the html tag. in the componen's (or page's) template <a jwcid="MyLink" ... will produce <a href="..." My proposal: ======== @Component(type="PageLink",id="MyLink", jwcid="myPageLink", page="MyPage") public abstract PageLink in the template: <a jwcid="myPageLink">... should produce: <a id="MyLink" href... > annotation "component" parameter "id" making it impossible to define an id > parameter > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TAPESTRY-603 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-603 > Project: Tapestry > Type: Wish > Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: Ron Piterman > > defining @Component(id = "...") making it impossible to define id attribute > to components. > Id is a very important attribute in html, this is a serious limitation. > Why not use jwcid instead (which is also very intuitive...) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
