[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-614?page=comments#action_12320706 
] 

Jesse Kuhnert commented on TAPESTRY-614:
----------------------------------------

OMG....I kept ignoring the little voice in my head that kept telling me to go 
look at the portlet code because I rememered reading something about being able 
to render different response types to different portions of a page. That's what 
I get for being lazy..

Is it really that easy? I've already been calling cycle.renderPage() from my 
rendering service, what's to stop the Body component from stealing the script 
outputs that I want? Doesn't it create it's own pagerendersupport in it's 
prepareForRender() regardless? Is there something funny going on in the portlet 
code that prevents the Body component from being inserted into the rendering 
process? 

I understand the bandwidth issues :) I thought actually working on an 
open-source project would solve the mystery of how all of these people find the 
time/resources to contribute to them so much. I think I sort of imagined a 
secret billionare-ish philanthropist running around the world sprinkling money 
into the pocketbooks of the developers, but that doesn't seem to be the case. 

> Provide access to PageRenderSupportImpl
> ---------------------------------------
>
>          Key: TAPESTRY-614
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-614
>      Project: Tapestry
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Contrib
>  Environment: any
>     Reporter: Jesse Kuhnert

>
> In order to control the flow of what content gets written to where in the 
> output response of an ajax request, I need to be able to also allow the 
> addition of javascript content in the response, seperate from the conent of 
> the Body component, which requires working with PageRenderSupportImpl 
> directly. 
> I have been very naughty and gotten around this by subclassing Body via an 
> EnhancementWorker, which I was already doing for normal component 
> IMarkupWriter output capture/supression, and added in a Class.getDeclared() 
> sort of hack to give access to the field from the subclass...
> Unless there is another way to do this? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to