Not at all! There's no reason not to make changes, and even a 3.0.4 release is possible, if someone wants to drive it. That someone is not me.
On 9/9/05, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've run into an issue in Tapestry 3.0.3 and now another user on the > list is requesting the same thing. > > Basicly I have a squeeze adapter that squeezes objects obtained from > Hibernate for use in forms. I'd like to be able to use the same thing > in my persistent properties. This would entail creating a custom > PageRecoder that checks for my Hib objs and squeezes them before > inserting into the session and unsqueezes them upon recovery from the > session. > > Problem is the implementation of BaseEngine#createPageRecorder(String > pageName, IRequestCycle cycle) relies on private variables and thus is > not easily overridable. > > Fixing this behaviour is easy but it would involve a commit into the > 3.0 branch. Is 3.0 too "dead" for this? > > Geoff > > -- > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > Get help with Spindle: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user > Announcement Feed: > http://www.jroller.com/rss/glongman?catname=/Announcements > Feature Updates: http://spindle.sf.net/updates > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator, Jakarta Tapestry Creator, Jakarta HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
