[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-547?page=all ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship resolved TAPESTRY-547:
-------------------------------------------
Fix Version: 4.0
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Howard M. Lewis Ship
I now think this is correct behavior; really, the script is expected to be
located relative to the file containing the <inject> or @InjectScript.
> @InjectScript computes the location differently the <inject type="script"/>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAPESTRY-547
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-547
> Project: Tapestry
> Type: Bug
> Components: Annotations
> Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> The @InjectScript annotation calculates the location of the script relative
> to the .class file for the component. The <inject type="script"/>
> calculcates the location relative to the .jwc file (possibly a virtual .jwc
> file if no real file exists). For an application component, this is the
> difference between WEB-INF/foo.script and classpath:/bif/baf/foo.script.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
