> That sounds good, but maybe its better to keep the "newest and greatest" > in HEAD, and create a 2.1 branch when 2.1 is released, and maybe later > release a bugfix release 2.1.1 out of the 2.1 branch. >
Actually, here there's a sensible technical reason; CVS is oriented around development occuring in branches and just bug fixes in the HEAD. It is much easier to release changes from a branch into HEAD than the other way around. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tapestry.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
