On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 17:21 Europe/Zurich, Schneider, Eric wrote:
> Petite? Is that you? :-) Damn! I have been unmasked :-) > > You will have no trouble hitting the ground running with tapestry. My > experiences so far have been extremely pleasant. Good to hear. > > > [skip some good explanation] > > I think many people are looking for a top-to-bottom WO like solution. > So > far the combination of technologies I've been playing with has been a > close > match (eclipse/ant/tapestry/cayenne). I see. That's what several other people are experimenting with. I'm still not quiet sure about which way to go: simply rewrite the all damn thing (EOF/WOF) or try to get along with cayenne/tapestry. Oh, well... Cheers, PA. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Tapestry-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tapestry-developer
