Generics are no better with their awful syntax. It looks like the typing I save in typecasting is more than destroyed by ugly syntax. Also, what is "for (Item a : list)"? C# scores +1 for "for (Item a in list)" and +1 for event-dispatch model.
-----Original Message----- From: sales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 4:04 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tapestry and Java 5.0 Henri Dupre wrote: > On Apr 1, 2005 12:31 PM, Bruno Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>* Is it a good idea at this point in time to rely on Java 5.0 ? > > I'm developping using many new Java 5 features and I'm surprised at > how nicely the new features integrate with existing code. I really > like the generics, they allow you to write a much nicer code > especially with collections. Thanks for reminding me to check out the list of new features. All good. Except for varargs - how did anyone let that awful C-programmers-sop concept through! How to bastardize Java in 1 easy step. dd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
