Uhh, forgive me if I'm misunderstanding but that would be Ruby on
Rails, not plain Ruby.
-warner (new to Ruby and RoR)
On Apr 22, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Patrick Casey wrote:
Ick, Ruby! I downloaded the tutorial on that one, set up two tables,
joined them, and printed a list of 1,000 rows that included columns
from
each table.
Nine seconds and 1,001 SQL statements later I got my list :). Sorry,
but anything which uses an N+1 fetch method to resolve joins in
situations
like that is a non starter for a serious commercial app.
--- Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:52 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: If we call it Tapestry 4.0, not 3.x, Maybe we would do
much
Once we're all programming in Ruby, we won't have to argue about those
awful braces that should always open at the end of the line.
;-)
Jamie
PS and javadoc comments shouldn't have a blank line after them! It
makes
them look like they belong to the code above (breaks the proximity rule
of layout). :-D
<snip>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
