Howard,
I would like to get rid of our non-visual pages.  Currently, we are creating 
pages just to store components that are loaded dynamically.  We are creating 
one for each "tasklet".  However, we are considering putting all of our 
components for the entire system in one page.  Do you think that will affect 
performance or load time?  Is it a one time hit?  None of the pages is used 
visually.  And as such, I would like a way to get rid of the pages.  Is there 
some way to scan the directories find the .jwc's and create a "virtual" page?

BTW, if you need to, this is billable.

thanks,

Mark



-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 4/26/2005 5:23 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Anyway to get rid of the .page file?
 
Tapestry 4.0 includes a new mechanism whereby it searches a list of packages 
for your page or component classes. This is used if you omit the page 
specification, or omit the class attribute from the page specification. So 
you can go a bit further without a page specification, but it's still quite 
recommended!

On 4/25/05, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> You're going to want the .page file.
> 
> Unless you have such a simplistic website that you don't really need
> Tapestry in the first place, you will need properties on your pages,
> either to hold information that people enter in forms or to hold
> information that you've passed in to the page from elsewhere to
> display. You declare these in the .page file.
> 
> Todd
> 
> On Apr 25, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Hao Chen wrote:
> 
> > Hi, all
> >
> > I am new to Tapestry and just started playing with Tapestry 3.1. I
> > like defining all component attributes inside the .html file. But
> > because the page class is defined inside the .page file using
> > <page-specification class="...">, I cannot get rid of the .page file
> > completely. So I have provide a one-line .page file for every page.
> > This is really cumbersome.
> >
> > I wonder if there is anyway to eliminate the .page file? Can we define
> > some HTML directive and put the page class information inside the
> > .html file?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Hao
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work. http://howardlewisship.com


Reply via email to