Spencer W. Thomas wrote: > I'll try that (when I get back to work tomorrow), but I thought I had > already tried using "form" for the direction and still had the problem. > However, now that I think about it, I was nesting my form component > inside another component. Presumably the parameter needs to be "form" > in BOTH components?
Yes, or the direction can be auto, if the parameter is either required or has a default value. > > I need the explicit getItem() because I create the value of the Item in > the Java. And once I've made an explicit getItem(), I must also supply > setItem() or Tapestry gets upset. Then you'll want to read up on tapestry properties. Tapestry page instances are pooled, so standard getter/setters are a bad idea, unless the item is not specific to any one user. Have you considered implementing PageRenderListener and making the accessors abstract? Then you could set the value using the abstract accessors inside of pageBeginRender. Robert > > =S > > Robert Zeigler wrote: > >> Change the direction of item from "in" to either of "form" or "auto". >> Also, in your home page, you don't need the property accessors, unless >> you need to access the property from code. If you do, then the simplest >> way to make sure things work right is to make your class and those >> accessors abstract. >> >> Robert >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
