Norbert, get on the dev list and if we can get another vote, I think
you'd put us over the top. ;-)
Jamie
Paul Ferraro wrote:
This has been an ongoing debate on the dev list. Both committers and
users are split around whether or not this feature causes more confusion
than it helps. There was even a vote (which failed) on whether or not
to remove this feature. Check out the dev list archives and read what
has been said about this topic already. As a 4.0 alpha tester, feel
free to chime in on the dev list where your concerns for 4.0 will
receive better visibility.
Paul
Norbert Sándor wrote:
Hi,
In 4.0, I'm very confused because of default-binding. I always have to
check the parameter's default-binding attribute or explicitly use a
binding prefix.
Wouldn't it be better:
- if there is no binding prefix then it would be treated as "ognl" (if
someone wants then the appropriate custom binding prefix could be used)
- default-binding would go away
I think default-binding corrupts the consistency of the clean
component specifications!
For example if I look at the specification part
<component ....>
<binding name="something" value="property" />
</component>
then I don't know if "property" is a JavaBean property or it is the
name of an asset or a component. To know this, I have to check the
default-binding of the parameter.
So it makes the specification very hard to read.
What do you think?
Br,
Norbi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
