Components are only cached as part of a page. I think there's a
communication issue here; if he's using the same component twice on a
page, he'll see the constructor invoked twice.  Are we talking loops
here?  A loop renders its body multiple times, it doesn't create
multiple instances of its body.

On 6/22/05, Nick Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Components, just like pages are pooled, and are expected to be
> stateless and thread safe. I believe that you are in fact only getting
> 1 component on your page, its just being spit out multiple times. And
> in fact, if you go to another page with the same component, and with
> permitting factors, you will again get that same component.
> 
> (some on shout if I'm off base here, but thats my understanding)
> 
> -Nick
> 
> On 6/22/05, Edward Scanzano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a situtation where I have a page that includes
> > 0..n number of a component (let's call it A). I have
> > A.jwc A.html and A.java. Will tapestry create only one
> > A java object to represent each component or will each
> > component get it own java object instance. I noticed
> > that in my constructor for A it is getting called only
> > once and I have 2 components of type A on the page.
> >
> > Thanks
> > E
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
Creator, Jakarta HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to