This is not a Tapestry problem. It's the community (me included) the one that should contribute with those components. I've created several components and never upload them anywhere. I think you guys are in the same. I think what we need is a more "official" site where to upload components, and not personal attemps like tassel or tdelli. Perhaps a Tapestry subproject or something like that.
On 5 Jul 2005 15:09:07 -0000, Lennart Benoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I totaly agree. > Personaly, if i had to make a technology choice now without knowing > tapestry i would probaly go for JSF in favor of tapestry. One of the main > reasons would indeed be the lack of immediatly available and easy to use > advanced and nicely packaged components. > I have the impression that a lot of effort is put into the technical > aspacts of tapestry ( e.g. tapestry 4) but way too few in the packaging > and presentation. > As a matter of fact in my opinion tapestry will have to move fast or it > will become some sort of Macintosh for web developers. Used by a small > elite of die hards. > > Do not misunderstand! i absolutly love tapestry, it has potential and i > hope for a bright future. We should be aware of stiff competition tough. > > Kind regards, > Lennart > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: 07/05/05 - 09:40 > >To: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library! > > > >I have been working with tapestry for almost 3-4 months and its really > >nice. The development process and the productivity incressed a lot. > >But what i really miss (well i wish) is to have a big and robust > >component library. > > > >This has been already discussed in the mailing list, but i guess it > >deserves more attention. JSF, which i think is the biggest Tapestry > >competitor has already a lot of Subprojects, componentes libraries, > >even comercial ones(Well, yes is sun i know!) and i havent seen a new > >tapestry Components in a while. I think this issue is fundamental to > >new tapestry users. If i have to choose a new component technology the > >first thing that i will look are the components that the technology > >can offers...Tapestry is clearly behind JSF in this aspect. > > > >Any thoughts about how can we, Tapestry users, have big component > >library? Not just a repository. > > > >Juan > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
