And Tassel. I forgot to mention that one. That makes three...
Ron Piterman wrote:
ציטוט Pablo Ruggia:
This is not a Tapestry problem. It's the community (me included) the
one that should contribute with those components. I've created several
components and never upload them anywhere. I think you guys are in the
same.
I think what we need is a more "official" site where to upload
components, and not personal attemps like tassel or tdelli. Perhaps a
Tapestry subproject or something like that.
Since sourceforge is there, this should not be the problem. I think the
problem is *doing* it. Its fine when Howard organizes, but this one - I
think we have to do "on our self"...
On 5 Jul 2005 15:09:07 -0000, Lennart Benoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I totaly agree.
Personaly, if i had to make a technology choice now without knowing
tapestry i would probaly go for JSF in favor of tapestry. One of the
main
reasons would indeed be the lack of immediatly available and easy to use
advanced and nicely packaged components.
I have the impression that a lot of effort is put into the technical
aspacts of tapestry ( e.g. tapestry 4) but way too few in the packaging
and presentation.
As a matter of fact in my opinion tapestry will have to move fast or it
will become some sort of Macintosh for web developers. Used by a small
elite of die hards.
Do not misunderstand! i absolutly love tapestry, it has potential and i
hope for a bright future. We should be aware of stiff competition tough.
Kind regards,
Lennart
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 07/05/05 - 09:40
To: Juan Esteban Maya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: About a bigger Tapestry components library!
I have been working with tapestry for almost 3-4 months and its really
nice. The development process and the productivity incressed a lot.
But what i really miss (well i wish) is to have a big and robust
component library.
This has been already discussed in the mailing list, but i guess it
deserves more attention. JSF, which i think is the biggest Tapestry
competitor has already a lot of Subprojects, componentes libraries,
even comercial ones(Well, yes is sun i know!) and i havent seen a new
tapestry Components in a while. I think this issue is fundamental to
new tapestry users. If i have to choose a new component technology the
first thing that i will look are the components that the technology
can offers...Tapestry is clearly behind JSF in this aspect.
Any thoughts about how can we, Tapestry users, have big component
library? Not just a repository.
Juan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
