Apologies for that then, i just happened not to download tapestry by itself but appfuse. I'll download it and check for documentation now, thanks
----- Mensaje original ----- De: Kirk Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fecha: Jueves, Julio 7, 2005 4:04 pm Asunto: RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: AW: User documentation > Not only is there a link to the reference, it's also shipped with the > download, so just bookmark the doc stored on your pc and you will > have it at > your fingertips. That said, there are about 100 posts asking for > the link > to the doc - check one of those out for the url. > > _______________________ > Kirk Gray > Revolent Technologies, Inc. > 12020 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 360 > Reston, VA 20191 > o. 703.773.2040 x220 > m. 703.606.9954 > f. 703.773.2047 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 9:56 AM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: AW: User documentation > > > +1 > I have been trying to learn tapestry but I happened to chose the > worst time > to do so.. No documentation support nor reference library makes it > realhard. > ----- Mensaje original ----- > De: Saqib Rasul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fecha: Jueves, Julio 7, 2005 3:34 pm > Asunto: AW: User documentation > > > +1 to that. > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Hensley, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Wednesday, 6 July 2005 8:18 PM > > An: Tapestry users > > Cc: Travis Klotz > > Betreff: RE: User documentation > > > > I agree, it should be at the top. Labeled something like "Stable > > Tapestry Version Documentation" > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:15 AM > > To: Tapestry users > > Cc: Travis Klotz > > Subject: Re: User documentation > > > > On Jul 6, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Hensley, Richard wrote: > > > > > There is a link on the Tapestry home page to the old > > documentation. > > > Check > > > out the status section at http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/ > > > #Status now I > > > would agree that it is not a big link, but it is a link. > > > > Fair enough, but it is in a non-intuitive section and it's a non- > > descriptive link. Reading down, there's a section titled > "Tapestry > > 4.0" and a section titled "Upgrading from Tapestry 3.0", so I > would > > naturally look for a section titled "Tapestry 3.0", but there of > > course is not one. The big red warning box in the "Status" > section > > doesn't help matters, since it'll catch the user's attention > > immediately and make it look as though that section is only about > > 4.0. Now, we can debate whether or not the user should read the > > whole page, but the requested information certainly could be made > > easier to find. > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
