I guess the same way commons-lang were, although there is new version of it
that doesn't have conflicts with JDK1.5 enum keyword.
Everyone strives for fewer number of them because of possible jar hell
inside some containers, less worries of downloading it from somewhere, and
generally grasping any framework structure and it's requirements is easier
if there are fewer of dependencies.
-V.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mind Bridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: <listener-binding> and BSF dependency
Just curious: how is that dependency a problem?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vjeran Marcinko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 11:33 AM
Subject: <listener-binding> and BSF dependency
Hi.
Is BSF library used only because of <listener-binding> feature in 3.0 ?
Does
anyone uses it?
If none seems interested in this feature anymore, and dependency is there
solely because of it, maybe it could all be removed in 4.0?
-Vjeran
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
