Hey, great tip! I had looked at the source code and was actually
wondering why it wasn't adding my informal parameters, but obviously I
didn't look closely enough. I'll use you suggestion next time I use
RadioPropertySelectionRenderer (since I already wrote my .script and
am pretty happy with the results :-)
Regards,
Dario
On 7/21/05, Nick Westgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Darío.
>
> Look at the source code. It only takes a minute to find out why.
> You're passing in a RadioPropertySelectionRenderer, right?
>
> If there is no renderer, PropertySelection puts onChange and
> informal parameters in the select tag:
> writer.begin("select");
> ...
> if (getSubmitOnChange())
> writer.attribute("onchange", "javascript:this.form.submit();");
> ...
> renderInformalParameters(writer, cycle);
>
> But if you use a renderer, that renderer does whatever it wants.
> RadioPropertySelectionRenderer doesn't output informal parameters,
> but you could easily modify it to do what you want.
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
>
> Darío Vasconcelos wrote:
> > Whatever. In the end, I decided to use a Script component to add the
> > onChange functionality. Nevertheless, it seems to me too big a problem
> > just to include a tiny onChange script...
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/21/05, Darío Vasconcelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>OK, nevermind. After googling the subject, I came across an article
> >>that explains how to render a PropertySelection as a table of radio
> >>buttons...
> >>
> >><span jwcid="@PropertySelection" model="..." value="..."
> >>renderer="ognl:@[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> >>/>
> >>
> >>Good. Now I just want to know how to add an onChange event to the
> >>PropertySelection, since I'm using it to turn on and off a series of
> >>layers...
> >>
> >>Is this possible? The PropertySelection seems to ignore whatever
> >>informal parameters I add...
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Dario
> >>
> >>On 7/21/05, Darío Vasconcelos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I want to include a radio button in my app, but without the
> >>>look-and-feel that RadioGroup offers. The documentation says a Radio
> >>>component can be indirectly wrapped inside a RadioGroup component. How
> >>>is this?
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Communism is man's exploitation of man. Capitalism is just the opposite.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Communism is man's exploitation of man. Capitalism is just the opposite.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Communism is man's exploitation of man. Capitalism is just the opposite.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
