Chris Nelson wrote: > Hmm, I think your solution looks much nicer. Seems > more elegant. I may refactor my code. I'm developing WebObjects for 2 years now, and there the functions operate on cursors (behaves like 'defer=false' by default, like it was in tap3). So I'm used to this approach. But, you're right - the parameter looks nicer (plus we may add any other ognl expressions as more function parameters! it's really cute).
Also, I think that passing parameters may be faster and more efficient, as theoretically there is no need to iterate the Foreach to get the cursor (I know it iterates it anyway, but it's just theory) -- Greets, Adam Czysciak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform, SE 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
