This is the stacktrace:

# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.ComponentClassFactory.checkAccessors(ComponentClassFactory.java:294)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.ComponentClassFactory.scanForParameterProperty(ComponentClassFactory.java:451)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.ComponentClassFactory.scanForParameterEnhancements(ComponentClassFactory.java:385)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.ComponentClassFactory.scanForEnhancements(ComponentClassFactory.java:353)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.ComponentClassFactory.needsEnhancement(ComponentClassFactory.java:145)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.DefaultComponentClassEnhancer.constructComponentClass(DefaultComponentClassEnhancer.java:141)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.enhance.DefaultComponentClassEnhancer.getEnhancedClass(DefaultComponentClassEnhancer.java:97)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageLoader.instantiateComponent(PageLoader.java:603)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageLoader.createImplicitComponent(PageLoader.java:569)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.BaseComponentTemplateLoader.createImplicitComponent(BaseComponentTemplateLoader.java:295)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.BaseComponentTemplateLoader.process(BaseComponentTemplateLoader.java:237)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.BaseComponentTemplateLoader.process(BaseComponentTemplateLoader.java:172)
# org.apache.tapestry.BaseComponent.readTemplate(BaseComponent.java:100)
# org.apache.tapestry.BaseComponent.finishLoad(BaseComponent.java:135)
# 
org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageLoader.constructComponent(PageLoader.java:519)
# org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageLoader.loadPage(PageLoader.java:764)
# org.apache.tapestry.pageload.PageSource.getPage(PageSource.java:152)
# org.apache.tapestry.engine.RequestCycle.getPage(RequestCycle.java:195)

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: 08/17/05 - 09:35
>To: Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Re: enhance problem
>
>I don't know for sure, but it may be possible that the
>EnhancementWorker logic specifically checks for certain
>"allowed"
>enhancements, it could be that component id's are one of the
>things
>that it won't allow changes to. ..Do you have a full stack trace?
>
>
>On 17 Aug 2005 14:16:41 -0000, Lennart Benoot
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have a problem with enhancing a class.  Everything works fine in
>developement but on the test system i get the following exception:
>> 
>> org.apache.tapestry.ApplicationRuntimeException
>> Unable to enhance class org.apache.tapestry.AbstractComponent
>because it implements a non-abstract read method for property
>'id'.
>> 
>> Tapestry versions should be the same.
>> 
>> Any ideas?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Lennart
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to