Hi Eric, Thanks for your reply. I didn't know backport175 so I started writing the xdoclet plugin. I'll give it a try.. maybe it's a better solution than XDoclet. The point is, my plugin is not far from being complete so I think would be cool to finish it anyway. I'll dig in backport asap... maybe we'll end up with two ways to do the same thing. That's the bad and good of open source... isn't it?
Paolo On 8/24/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Aug 24, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Paolo Donà wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > I started writing an XDoclet2 Tapestry4 plugin for page and component > > specification files generation. > > I'm stuck with jdk1.4.x so I cannot use Annotations and I find it > > useful. > > The plugin is functional but doesn't cover the full T4 dtd yet. > > Maybe someone could help me testing and improving it. > > > > The xdoclet2-plugins home is > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdoclet-plugins/ > > you'll find it in CVS HEAD at > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/xdoclet-plugins/xdoclet- > > plugins/plugin-tapestry > > Have you considered using backport-175 - http:// > backport175.codehaus.org/ <http://backport175.codehaus.org/> ? Perhaps the > annotation infrastructure > that Howard created could be cloned into something that used > backport-175 instead of using XDoclet. > > Erik (still officially an XDoclet committer, ironically) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
