yes!!!!

what a wonderful idea to put the session lifetime inside the DAO itself.

you made me see the light at the end of the tunnel!!

thank you so much !! :-))))))

Best regards
Peter


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Patrick Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. September 2005 14:48
An: 'Tapestry users'
Betreff: RE: hibernate + tapestry (again for the 1,000,000th time)



        I just finished a major refactor to put in that sort of
functionality and more fine grained transactions. The approach I took
was to switch over to a DAO pattern and carry the session along with the
DAO (disconnecting at the end of the transaction).

        So a typical (long) transaction was:

        GenericDAO g = new GenericDAO("foo");
        g.loadInstance(key);
        // render view
        g.disconnectSession();
        // return to user
        // user pushes save
        // fetch g from HTTPSession
        g.reconnet()
        // rewind
        g.doAction(Action.SAVE);
        

        Basically each transaction gets its own private Long session
this way. For non transactional data, I switched back to a session per
thread pattern which seems to be working for me.

        --- Pat

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 5:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: hibernate + tapestry (again for the 1,000,000th time)
> 
> I am working on a implementation of 
> 'session-per-application-transaction'
> 
> described here: http://www.hibernate.org/168.html
> 
> Has anybody ever managed _all_ of these with hibernate + tapestry?
> 
> - not using object-id's for reference but object references for the 
> business objects (at least within a single application transaction)
> - not needing attach / detach / merge on a regular base to resync 
> object instances with the cache
> - not prefetching associations to avoid LazyInitializationException
> - not using silly data transfer objects
> - having application transactions with a lifetime of longer than a 
> simple http request
> - having automatic transaction control with commit as a default
> - having custom transaction control in your application (explicit: 
> begin / commit / rollback)
> - clearing / closing the session at the end of the transaction without

> making long living session state objects invalid
> 
> Maybe I am just asking for too much...
> 
> Hibernate and Tapestry are excellent products (probably the best in 
> their
> category)
> 
> Just combining them will drive you _really_ insane :-(
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to