No I think you are basically right, but there is a lot more going on than you describe.
ApplicationObjects don't have any other special construct within hivemind than any other service configuration contribution...Other than the fact that howard has made most of the inner workings of tapestry configurable/constructed via hivemind. Almost any aspect of the system can be found as a service within hivemind. Once you get beyond a basic understanding of tapestry it would behoove most people to become very familiar with hivemind. It's not any harder to grock than spring though. It's the same exact thing, only it happens to be used directly by tapestry for almost everything. If you download the tacos demo war application you can start to get a better feel for how these things start interacting..The demo web-inf configures only one service (SiteMap), but if you look at the tacos source under net.sf.tacos you will find a few more hivemodule.xml files used to configure and allow tacos to integrate into tapestry. jesse On 10/27/05, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems to me that a hivemind service is similar to a contribution to > ApplicationObjects with scope "application". Is this true or am I > getting lost in hivemind? > > Thanks, > > Henri. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
