I think this is a pretty valid thread. It would be good to know,
that if action link is deprecated then what is the best way to send an
object from page to page without having to expose the primary key.
Gentry, Michael (Contractor) wrote:
I really like ActionLink since it works a lot like WebObjects works
(link-wise). If it is deprecated, that'll just make things more
difficult since serializing objects or putting the primary key of
database records on the URL isn't really desirable (for my stuff, at
least).
/dev/mrg
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: What to replace ActionLinks with?
On Thursday 03 Nov 2005 01:37, Mark Shead wrote:
So going forward is Tapestry going to no longer support transparently
working with objects across a request response cycle?
I think that is probably my lack of knowlege. I think you can pass
objects as
parameters - but I suspect you have to be able to serialize them or
something. Don't really know.
In the instance I gave, that was not what I needed to do. I was
building a
new object (Marriage) to write into my database, and it just needed the
ID
values.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
