Ron, you're right, but you're wrong. In the pretend ideal world of "CSS can
do everything for everybody" you are absolutely correct. I wish this were
the case, as I too am a proponent of CSS design. Maybe ten years from now
we'll be in a position to do exactly this. However, we are not. In addition,
suppose the user turns off CSS? It would be a poor degradation if the page
was delocalized based on the state of CSS on the browser.

On 11/11/05, mike jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Surely it would be fine if it has a for paramater?
> Actually thinking about it how about resolving it in the delegate using
> explicit association with the labels e.g.
>
> <label>
> <input type="text" name="firstname" />
> First Name
> </label>
>
> That may work, but I had bit of trouble with the new fieldlabel element in
> tapestry 4, will have a look at it when I get home.
>
> On 11/11/05, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Its not about css vs tables but css RTL vs HTML RTL.
> > if you implement RTL by html you can forget about accessibility.
> > Also, RTL should be supported by almost all browsers...
> > By the way, for which language?
> >
> >
> > ציטוט mike jones:
> > > You may think its a mistake but I suspect that most people who wanted
> > some
> > > text to follow a input element would do it.
> > > A css based form layout is rather tricky and why spend ages getting
> > right
> > > css that will works on all browsers when you can do something as
> simple
> > as
> > > putting it it a table?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/11/05, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>ציטוט Todd Orr:
> > >>
> > >>>This problem is probably very important for those of us that localize
> > >>
> > >>our
> > >>
> > >>>pages for languages that read from right to left, or checkboxes that
> > >>>sometimes look more aesthetically pleasing when they appear before
> the
> > >>>label.
> > >>
> > >>For checkboxes maybe, but RTL should work without changin the html
> > >>order. Use CSS to defign that. It is in fact a mistake implementing
> RTL
> > >>by changeing the html order.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>On 11/10/05, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>Getting the FieldLabel to work with the various field components
> > >>>>(TextField, etc.) is problematic, and only works if the FieldLabel
> > >>>>precedes the field itself. I'm not certain this can be properly
> fixed.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>On 11/10/05, mike jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Hi
> > >>>>>I have the following in one of my html files.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>><span jwcid="@FieldLabel" field="component:title" />
> > >>>>><input jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" validators="validators:required"
> > >>>>>displayName="Title" value="ognl:post.title" type="text"
> > class="textbox"
> > >>>>
> > >>>>/>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>><br/>
> > >>>>><textarea jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" validators="validators:required"
> > >>>>>displayName="Text" value="ognl:post.text"></textarea>
> > >>>>><span jwcid="@FieldLabel" field="component:text" displayName="Text"
> > />
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>When both fields are not filled in I get the following messages
> from
> > >>
> > >>the
> > >>
> > >>>>>validation delegate when I loop through the formerrors
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>- You must enter a value for Title.
> > >>>>>- You must enter a value for Text.
> > >>>>>- You must enter a value for Text.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>Infact the same occurs whenever the field label follows the
> component
> > >>
> > >>it
> > >>
> > >>>>>references.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>I searched throught the bug list but I couldnt find anything
> relating
> > >>
> > >>to
> > >>
> > >>>>it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>Any help would be appreciated
> > >>>>>Cheers
> > >>>>>Mike
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>--
> > >>>>>d-_-b \m/(>_<)\m/ (9ò_ó)-o(@_o)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>--
> > >>>>Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > >>>>Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> > >>>>Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> > >>>>Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> > >>>>and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
> > >>>>
> >
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > d-_-b \m/(>_<)\m/ (9ò_ó)-o(@_o)
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> d-_-b \m/(>_<)\m/ (9ò_ó)-o(@_o)
>

Reply via email to