Yep, here is what I have.

reverse.application

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE application PUBLIC
"-//Apache Software Foundation//Tapestry Specification 4.0//EN"
"http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";>
<application>
    <meta key="org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages" value="
com.gthought.pages"/>
</application>

And my Home.class is package com.gthought.pages.Home;

web.xml is

<servlet>
            <description>Application Servlet for Tapestry</description>
            <servlet-name>reverse</servlet-name>
            <servlet-class>org.apache.tapestry.ApplicationServlet
</servlet-class>
            <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
        </servlet>

        <servlet-mapping>
            <servlet-name>reverse</servlet-name>
            <url-pattern>/app</url-pattern>
        </servlet-mapping>




On 1/13/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can Tapestry locate your Home class; did you configure it with the
> corrent package(s) to search?  org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages
>
> On 1/13/06, Gregg Bolinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to get a good feel for replacing as much in the .page file
> using
> > annotations.  I have a very simple page and I have used annotations for
> the
> > Form and the TextField.  I tried removing the .page file completely,
> > assuming it was no longer needed, but I got an exception:
> >
> > Page 'Home' not found in application namespace.
> >
> > My question is what can I do, if anything, to lose the .page file
> > completely?  Or do I have to have one no matter what, just empty.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Gregg
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
> Creator, Jakarta Tapestry
> Creator, Jakarta HiveMind
>
> Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
> and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to