Pat,
It's Saturday, just go and have a beer.
:-)
-Serge
Patrick Casey wrote:
Huh? A double is a double is a double, regardless of the processor's
register size, neh? Isn't that one of the guarantees of the JVM?
--- Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Sergei Dubov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 11:12 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: [OT] 3.163 + 0.001 = ???
Just switch to AMD 64 CPU, it is more precise than Intel.
:-))))
Serge.
Gunna Satria wrote:
Hi All,
I tried this code:
double a = 3.163;
double b = 0.001;
double c = a+b;
System.out.println("c = "+c);
and the result is, c = 3.1679999999999997
not 3.164 like i expected
how come?
regards,
Gunna
---------------------------------
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
