Geoff, Have you considered bringing it under the Apache/Tapestry umbrella? I am sure others would love to help...
regards, Mark -----Original Message----- From: Inge Solvoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 5:09 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Eclipse (with spindle 3.2.13) + Tapestry 4 + DTD problem. Yes, that sounds like an awful lot of work for one guy. You're all alone on this? I'm surprised there isn't a community behind this plugin, with it's huge popularity. Spindle for tapestry 3 was a life saver for me in 2005, thanks a lot! Inge On 1/24/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops, I wasn't clear. I'm working on the *builder*, the invisible, > behind the scenes scrapper that finds all the boo boos and makes the > error markers. The output of the builder feeds all the eye candy - > editors - syntax completion - jump to - outline views - most wizards - > etc. > > No point in starting any UI stuff until the builder works. The > annotations are a must have but they could be deferred til after the > eye candy effort. > > The wizards have to be redone as wedging in Specless things would be > pretty hard the ways things sit today. And the editors are sorely in > need of a redo - not mention some decoupling from my hacky xml parser > and Eclipse in general so that folks like Hugo can reuse. WTP is what > I have in mind as a target for the editors. > > Lots of work! > > Geoff > > On 1/24/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Geoff, > > That sounds great, I am sure everyone appreciates all of the time you > are putting into it! Just a thought, would it be possible to release an > early version without all of the 4.0 upgrades? For instance, just the > features that were available in 3.03 (i.e. no annotations)? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tue 1/24/2006 6:50 AM > > To: Tapestry users > > Subject: Re: Eclipse (with spindle 3.2.13) + Tapestry 4 + DTD problem. > > > > Yes, Spindle currently ships with Tapestry 3.0.3 DTDs and does not > > understand Tapestry 4 at all. > > > > On the Spindle for T4 side: I've managed to nail down the "Eclipse > > agnostic" part of Spindle (which is great for Hugo and tapidea) and am > > now tackling the algorithm for 'finding & resolving' all the tapestry > > bits in a project. That's a huge part of the whole builder effort. And > > the scariest. Could be a few iterations before I nail that down. > > > > Once that's done I'll tackle the variations needed to support > > annotations and validation. > > > > Work continues every second of free time I can squeeze out. > > > > Geoff > > > > On 1/24/06, Ivano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I believe that Spindle for Tap 4.0 is still in an early development. > > > The latest release is intended for Tap 3.0.3 and so it could be that > it > > > gives you some DTD inconsistencies based on the version assumption. > > > > > > Ivano Pagano > > > > > > Daniel Lydiard wrote: > > > > > > >Hello, I'm in the process of upgrading tapestry 3 to 4. > > > > > > > >I've updated all DTD's for *.page and *.jwc to use the 4.0 URI... > > > > > > > >Now eclipse gives me a "Could not find a DOCTYPE with a valid > Tapestry DTD (public id)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >wln.application: > > > ><?xml version="1.0"?> > > > ><!DOCTYPE application PUBLIC > > > > "-//Apache Software Foundation//Tapestry Specification 4.0//EN" > > > > "http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd"> > > > > > > > ><application name="wln"> > > > > <!-- Component Libraries --> > > > > <library id="contrib" > specification-path="/org/apache/tapestry/contrib/Contrib.library"/> > > > > <library id="usc" > specification-path="/es/usc/tapestry/components/Calendar.library"/> > > > ></application> > > > > > > > >I also tried adding the URI to the eclipse XML catalog and disabling > spindle but that didn't work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > > Get help with Spindle: > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user > > Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman > > Feature Updates: http://spindle.sf.net/updates > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > Get help with Spindle: > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user > Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman > Feature Updates: http://spindle.sf.net/updates > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >