Geoff,
Have you considered bringing it under the Apache/Tapestry umbrella?  I am sure 
others would love to help...

regards,

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Inge Solvoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 1/25/2006 5:09 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Eclipse (with spindle 3.2.13) + Tapestry 4 + DTD problem.
 
Yes, that sounds like an awful lot of work for one guy. You're all alone on
this? I'm surprised there isn't a community behind this plugin, with it's
huge popularity.

Spindle for tapestry 3 was a life saver for me in 2005, thanks a lot!

Inge

On 1/24/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oops, I wasn't clear. I'm working on the *builder*, the invisible,
> behind the scenes scrapper that finds all the boo boos and makes the
> error markers. The output of the builder feeds all the eye candy -
> editors - syntax completion - jump to - outline views - most wizards -
> etc.
>
> No point in starting any UI stuff until the builder works. The
> annotations are a must have but they could be deferred til after the
> eye candy effort.
>
> The wizards have to be redone as wedging in Specless things would be
> pretty hard the ways things sit today. And the editors are sorely in
> need of a redo - not mention some decoupling from my hacky xml parser
> and Eclipse in general so that folks like Hugo can reuse. WTP is what
> I have in mind as a target for the editors.
>
> Lots of work!
>
> Geoff
>
> On 1/24/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Geoff,
> > That sounds great, I am sure everyone appreciates all of the time you
> are putting into it!  Just a thought, would it be possible to release an
> early version without all of the 4.0 upgrades?  For instance, just the
> features that were available in 3.03 (i.e. no annotations)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tue 1/24/2006 6:50 AM
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: Eclipse (with spindle 3.2.13) + Tapestry 4 + DTD problem.
> >
> > Yes, Spindle currently ships with Tapestry 3.0.3 DTDs and does not
> > understand Tapestry 4 at all.
> >
> > On the Spindle for T4 side: I've managed to nail down the "Eclipse
> > agnostic" part of Spindle (which is great for Hugo and tapidea) and am
> > now tackling the algorithm for 'finding & resolving' all the tapestry
> > bits in a project. That's a huge part of the whole builder effort. And
> > the scariest. Could be a few iterations before I nail that down.
> >
> > Once that's done I'll tackle the variations needed to support
> > annotations and validation.
> >
> > Work continues every second of free time I can squeeze out.
> >
> > Geoff
> >
> > On 1/24/06, Ivano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I believe that Spindle for Tap 4.0 is still in an early development.
> > > The latest release is intended for Tap 3.0.3 and so it could be that
> it
> > > gives you some DTD inconsistencies based on the version assumption.
> > >
> > > Ivano Pagano
> > >
> > > Daniel Lydiard wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hello, I'm in the process of upgrading tapestry 3 to 4.
> > > >
> > > >I've updated all DTD's for *.page and *.jwc to use the 4.0 URI...
> > > >
> > > >Now eclipse gives me a "Could not find a DOCTYPE with a valid
> Tapestry DTD (public id)".
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >wln.application:
> > > ><?xml version="1.0"?>
> > > ><!DOCTYPE application PUBLIC
> > > >  "-//Apache Software Foundation//Tapestry Specification 4.0//EN"
> > > >  "http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";>
> > > >
> > > ><application name="wln">
> > > >  <!-- Component Libraries -->
> > > >  <library id="contrib"
> specification-path="/org/apache/tapestry/contrib/Contrib.library"/>
> > > >  <library id="usc"
> specification-path="/es/usc/tapestry/components/Calendar.library"/>
> > > ></application>
> > > >
> > > >I also tried adding the URI to the eclipse XML catalog and disabling
> spindle but that didn't work.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Spindle guy.          http://spindle.sf.net
> > Get help with Spindle:
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user
> > Blog:                     http://jroller.com/page/glongman
> > Feature Updates:          http://spindle.sf.net/updates
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The Spindle guy.          http://spindle.sf.net
> Get help with Spindle:
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/spindle-user
> Blog:                     http://jroller.com/page/glongman
> Feature Updates:          http://spindle.sf.net/updates
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to