Ok, fixed in trunk documentation. Will merge into 4.0 branch eventually.
On 1/26/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Basically, you just use the "validators" binding to specify ids for any > validators you want to apply to the field: > <binding name="validators" value="validators:required,minLength=4"/> > > the "validators:" prefix will look up the validator ids in the > "tapestry.form.validator.Validators" configuration point. > Some predefined validators are already available, read here: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/validation.html#validation.fields > > > Or you can make your own custom validator by implementing this interface: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/form/validator/Validator.html > and adding it to that configuration point. > Download the tapestry source and look at these files, should give you an > idea on how to make a custom validator: > \framework\src\descriptor\META-INF\tapestry.form.validator.xml > \framework\src\java\org\apache\tapestry\form\validator\Email.java > > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:38:19 +0100, Adrian Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I'm trying to setup some validators in a small test application I'm > > writing. > > I have to say that as a newcomer the tapestry documentation leaves a lot > > to > > be desired. There seems to be a lot of conflicting information as parts > > are > > updated for 4.0 and other parts aren't. But on to my specific > > question... > > > > > > This is an excerpt from the TextField component reference: > > > > A TextField may be decorated by the Form's validation delegate, but does > > not > > have a validator, so is limited in editting properties types beyond > > string. > > In most cases, the ValidField component is preferred. > > > > > > And this is an excerpt from the ValidField component: > > > > Warning > > This component has been deprecated; Tapestry 4.0 adds even better > support > > for validation to TextField, TextArea and most other form element > > component. > > > > > > And there's even a link to the TextField reference page in the warning. > > Is > > there some documentation somewhere that describes how to do TextField > > validation using the 4.0 "better support for validation". Or am I > > looking > > at the wrong reference? > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
