I think that as much fun as everything is, Howard and I would probably both prefer to play in our own virtual sandboxes for things like this.
On 2/20/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about the Tapestry project at JavaForge that Howard set up? Is this > not what you have in mind? That's where Tapestry-Flash, Tapestry-Prop, > and > Tapestry-Spring live. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 12:26 PM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: tapestry component sub-project > > It has been voiced on a few occassions that an official tapestry > sub-project > based around components and contributors to those components may be > beneficial. > > I think it would be nice to have a project like this, it would allow > tapestry to have a clearer/safer feeling repository of components that are > community maintained, while also providing all of the valuable resources > that being a part of apache provides. It makes sense to have a sub-project > as well, because it would allow (in theory?) people to be voted in to the > sub-project as committers without going through as much red tape as might > be > required to be on tapestr itself. > > Is there a formal definition of how to propose something like this? Would > it > more or less look similar to incubator proposals? > > I'm thinking initially that I'd like to try and more or less move some of > the tacos stuff into this repository. Whatever developers feel like coming > along with me would be voted into this sub-project and we could start > building out an infrastructure. I think this would also involve trying to > reach out to some of the other component respositories and seeing if we > can't find a solution that fits all needs. > > thoughts? > > jesse > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
