Yeah that would be great. If it allows it can you be sure it's set to tap4
and assigned to me?

On 3/23/06, Mike Snare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fantastic.  Would you like me to enter an enhancement request so it
> can be tracked?
>
> -Mike
>
> On 3/23/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No nothing like that. The trigger is something that happens anyways, ie
> the
> > IDirect interface.
> >
> > This would just provide a method hook that gurarantees the page you are
> > after is all loaded up, and that no direct methods have been called on
> it
> > yet. I'll try and do something.
> >
> > On 3/23/06, Mike Snare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That would rock.
> > >
> > > As to the triggerDirect, do you mean I would be able to actually take
> > > a page that meets my requirements and trigger a direct to a method
> > > (effectively calling the method) without having to render the page?
> > > That would work ok, i think.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > On 3/22/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > That sounds pretty damn clear. I don't know if it's in the last
> release,
> > > but
> > > > there is a method on DirectService at least that is called
> > > "triggerDirect"
> > > > or something else similar..It would allow you to do what you
> describe.
> > > >
> > > > If not that, I wouldn't be opposed to adding an extension point of
> some
> > > sort
> > > > into these services that would guarentee the page is loaded, but not
> yet
> > > > rendered . (nor any methods called on it yet)
> > > >
> > > > Some sort of extendable method that contains the params needed to do
> > > your
> > > > worst to the render chain. Would this help? We can probably get it
> into
> > > > 4.0.1, which will be coming out very soon.
> > > >
> > > > jesse
> > > > On 3/22/06, Mike Snare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm writing an interceptor to perform authentication checks and
> I'm
> > > > > contributing the interceptors to the major services (direct,
> asset,
> > > > > page, etc).  If the user is not logged in I throw a
> > > > > PageRedirectException to the login page.  If the page the user is
> > > > > trying to view implements a marker interface specifying that it
> can be
> > > > > returned to after login (I'm specifically not using external
> callback)
> > > > > then the 'nextPage' attribute of the login page is set before
> throwing
> > > > > the exception.  The Login page currently redirects back to the
> desired
> > > > > page by name.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's working fine, except for a couple of issues that may or may
> not
> > > > > be fixable.  That's where I need some expert help.
> > > > >
> > > > > The interceptor is invoked before the service method, so the page
> > > > > hasn't really been set up yet.  The interceptor actually has to
> look
> > > > > at the request parameters to find the name of the page we are
> going
> > > > > to.  It can't just call infrastructure.getRequestCycle.getPage.
> > > > > Another side effect of this early call is that none of the
> properties
> > > > > on the page have been set up yet, so even if I wanted to use
> > > > > ExternalCallback for pages that take parameters, I'm worried that
> I'm
> > > > > going to run into problems when the page actually gets called back
> > > > > because the ExternalCallback would be created in the interceptor
> (not
> > > > > in the page) and so the service parameters would have to be added
> > > > > as-is, in no particular order.  When the page gets called back it
> > > > > would have no way of knowing how to extract the parameters from
> the
> > > > > object array b/c it didn't specify the order.
> > > > >
> > > > > If I could somehow force the page to initialize itsself I could
> make
> > > > > it implement a method that knew how to take its parameters and
> create
> > > > > a object array from them and return it.  Can I force the class to
> > > > > implement itsself prior to the call to service()?
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone have any ideas?  My goal is to have as little work
> necessary
> > > > > for individual page developers to get this to work for them.
> > > > >
> > > > > It's almost 11 here, so pardon me if I'm not being particularly
> > > clear...
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jesse Kuhnert
> > > > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
> > > >
> > > > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > > > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.  http://opennotion.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Kuhnert
> > Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
> >
> > Open source based consulting work centered around
> > dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.  http://opennotion.com
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer

Open source based consulting work centered around
dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.  http://opennotion.com

Reply via email to