I don't think so, but why are you using a service for this? Seems
like it could be done in a static class or just an interface full of
constants.
-Mike
On 4/3/06, Adam Zimowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an interface ISettings with a bunch of getters all returning
> String which are simple constant string settings:
>
> public interface ISettings {
>
> public String getApplicationName();
> public String getApplicationVersion();
> public String getCookieJSessionId();
> public String getCookieAutoLogin();
> public String getSlash();
> public String getDirCss();
> public String getDirCssDefault();
> public String getDirMail();
> public String getDirImages();
> public String getFileCssMain();
> public String getFileMailRegConf();
> public String getFileMailPassChange();
> public String getFileMailPassReset();
> public String getFileImageHe();
> public String getFileImageShe();
> public String getFileImageGroup();
> }
>
> Can I use hivemind to set up values for this interface, and have
> hivemind generate a new bean based on this interface? Something like
> this:
>
> <service-point id="Configuration" interface="xxx.xxx.ISettings">
> <invoke-factory model="singleton">
> <construct class="xxx.xxx.Settings" model="singleton">
> <set property="applicationName" value="AppName.org"/>
> <set property="applicationVersion" value="0.1"/>
> <set property="cookieJSessionId" value="JSESSIONID"/>
> <set property="cookieAutoLogin" value="AutoLogin"/>
> <set property="splash" value="/"/>
> <set property="dirCss" value="css"/>
> <set property="dirCssDefault" value="Default"/>
> <set property="dirMail" value="mail"/>
> <set property="dirImages" value="images"/>
> <set property="fileCssMain" value="main.css"/>
> <set property="fileMailRegConf" value="reg_conf.txt"/>
> <set property="fileMailPassChange"
> value="pass_change.txt"/>
> <set property="fileMailPassReset"
> value="pass_reset.txt"/>
> <set property="fileImageHe" value="he.jpeg"/>
> <set property="fileImageShe" value="she.jpeg"/>
> <set property="fileImageGroup" value="couple.jpeg"/>
> </construct>
> </invoke-factory>
> </service-point>
>
> The thing is I'd like to avoid creating actual implementation of my
> ISettings interface because it's trivial and just more work (it's just
> private properties, getters and setters). And from what I'm seeing I
> need to tell hivemind about actual implementation. Is Hivemind capable
> of creating on-the-fly instance implementation of my interface and
> inject it to my code?
>
> Adam
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
