Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-taps-00-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-taps/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Define a set of Transport Services, prioritizing those provided by existing IETF protocols and congestion control mechanisms. As a starting point, the working group will consider services used between two endpoints. What does "prioritizing" mean in the above sentence? If I take your 4 examples (reliable delivery, no guarantee of order preservation (*) content privacy to in-path devices, and minimal latency.), how can you prioritize those? You can't, it's purely an application programmers choice. Or maybe I missed something? Don't you mean "identifying" instead of "prioritizing", or maybe "identifying the most common ones" (*) btw, same remark as Adrian wrt "no" guarantee of order preservation as a service _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
