Hi Stephanie- Here is the meeting request. Let me know if I've missed anything.
---aaron ====== WGname: TAPS Area: TSV # sessions: 1 Length of sessions: 2hrs # attendees: 80 People who must be present: [email protected], [email protected] Conflicts to avoid: appsarea aqm httpsbis iccrg (IRTF) icnrg (IRTF) mptcp ncrg (IRTF) nvo3 ppsp rmcat supa (BOF) tcpinc tcpm tsvarea tsvsg webpush Resources: - projector - meetecho On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Stephanie McCammon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > I’ve closed the session request tool today. Aaron, if you let me know the > requirements for the TAPS meeting (i.e. expected attendance, conflicts, > length of session) I will be happy to put the request in for you. Please > let me know the requirements prior to Wednesday. > > Sincerely, > > Stephanie McCammon > IETF Project Manager > 48377 Fremont Blvd, Ste. 117 > Fremont, CA 94538 > T: +1.510.492.4081 > F: +1.510.492.4001 > > Association Management Solutions (AMS) > Forum Management, Meeting, and Event Planning > www.amsl.com > > > > > On Sep 28, 2014, at 13:26 , Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Will do. > > > > --aaron > > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Spencer Dawkins < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Aaron, > > > > I should have asked - do you know how to request meeting slots, these > days? :-) > > > > I'm betting TAPS wasn't quite approved enough for you to be seeing > "please your meeting" emails for IETF 91, until now. > > > > There's an online request form at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/secr/sreq/. > > > > There's a description of the fields at > http://www.ietf.org/old/2009/instructions/session_request_tool_instruction.html > . > > > > Could you take a shot at that? > > > > I will, of course, approve the meeting :D > > > > Spencer > > > > > > On 09/26/2014 02:50 PM, Aaron Falk wrote: > >> Well, I hope you've all seen the good news that the TAPS wg has been > chartered. There were a few minor improvements made in the charter text > but nothing of substance. Spencer is looking for a co-chair with APPS area > expertise so if you have nominations, please send them to him. The wg will > be meeting in Honolulu this November so don't forget to grab hotel and > flights soon if you plan to attend. > >> > >> Let's get things started on the first doc. The first step is to select > one or two document editors. For the editor role it would be a good thing > (but not required) to have someone who has experience taking an IETF draft > through a wg to publication. Also, desirable is to have someone with > sufficient time to keep up on working group discussions, experience with ID > editing tools, and the ability to attend most IETF meetings. In Toronto, > we polled for volunteers for editor and the following folks raised their > hands: > >> > >> Brian Trammel > >> Michael Tuexen > >> Gorry Fairhurst > >> Michael Welzl > >> > >> Does anyone else want to volunteer? (Or any volunteers want to change > their mind?) I'll pause here for any discussion. > >> > >> --aaron > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Taps mailing list > >> > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
