> On 19 Dec 2014, at 10:35, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 19. des. 2014, at 20.29, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 19. des. 2014, at 20.05, Brian Trammell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 18 Dec 2014, at 22:37, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for this update!
>>>> 
>>>> A question:
>>>> 
>>>>> We've posted a -01 rev of the TAPS transports document. We believe that 
>>>>> the format and level of detail for the TCP section is about what we're 
>>>>> targeting for each of the other sections, but this is still open to 
>>>>> discussion.
>>>> 
>>>> Why is Nagle not a part of the protocol components and interface 
>>>> description? It’s mentioned in the protocol description above, and it’s 
>>>> something that an application decides.
>>> 
>>> Simple omission.
>>> 
>>> Should we make an attempt to give this (as a component) a generic name? 
>>> "Selectable sender side buffering"? Or can we just call it simply "Nagle"?
>> 
>> In 
>> http://heim.ifi.uio.no/michawe/research/publications/futurenet-icc2011.pdf 
>> we took SCTP's term for the same function because we found it more 
>> meaningful than "Nagle": Application PDU Bundling.  I like that - it's also 
>> perhaps useful to folks to reuse terminology when we mean the exact same 
>> thing.
> 
> Very sorry for writing a separate email! But having this open made me notice 
> another one: "error detection" (or "integrity check", whatever you prefer). 
> There's a checksum, it can't be disabled, it's covering the full data. 
> Different from some other protocols.
> And another: flow control. Mentioned in the text, but should be a component 
> because the feature that it implements is meaningful to an application (if 
> there's no flow control, you may have to take care of it yourself).

Yep, both excellent points. Will add to working -02.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian

> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to