Hi,
Maybe TRAM and MMUSIC? They have the potential of being a future TAPS user. Not sure other TAPSters are having this conflict. Would be nice to add, but maybe with a low priority flag of some kind? .-. Pål-Erik On 05 Jan 2015, at 22:53, Aaron Falk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It's time to sign up for a meeting slot at IETF-93 in Dallas. Here is the list of conflicts I have from the last meeting. My working definition of a conflict is that someone active (or planning to be active) in the working group has a commitment (e.g., an author or presenter) in another group that would prevent them from attending the meeting. Do we need to add any others? appsawg apparea aqm httpbis iccrg icnrg mptcp nvo3 ppsp rmcat tcpinc tcpm tsvarea tsvwg webpush --aaron _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
