HI,

A few initial comments the definition of the transport service features as
they appear from section 3 (and TAPS1):

Unidirectional/bidirectional: I am not sure what this means exactly:
Does it refer to that data transfer is negotiated for both directions
perhaps ? But then it only applies to connection oriented transport.
Does it refer to that control info is going back ?
Does it refer to that messages (which ever form) are going back on the
reverse network path ? Then it does not necessarily apply to SCTP MH.

   o  non-reliable delivery:
       add SCTP

   o  reliable delivery:
        add SCTP

  Suggest to rephrase

   o  reliable and partially reliable delivery
-->
   o  partially reliable delivery:
      SCTP

   o  drop notification :
       add SCTP

   o  ordered delivery:
       add SCTP

   o  unordered delivery:
       add SCTP

Ideally, I think, then one would use a common term for Nagle(-like)
bundling for TCP and SCTP.

BR, Karen

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Taps [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Welzl
>Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:22 AM
>To: taps WG
>Cc: Stein Gjessing
>Subject: [Taps] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-gjessing-taps-minset-
>00.txt
>
>Dear all,
>
>This is a very first stab at a draft addressing the charter's second item
- the
>minimal set of transport services that end systems should support.
>
>It is based on version 4 of draft-ietf-taps-transports, so the list of
features /
>components is not up to date - but that's not really the main point of
the
>document for now anyway:
>it's about showing how the number of exposed services *could* be reduced.
>Our hope is that, by sketching the possible destination of our journey,
this
>helps the current discussion of the first document.
>
>Cheers,
>Michael
>
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>> draft-gjessing-taps-minset-00.txt
>> Date: 22 Jun 2015 14:37:43 CEST
>> To: Michael Welzl <[email protected]>, Stein Gjessing
>> <[email protected]>, Stein Gjessing <[email protected]>, Michael Welzl
>> <[email protected]>
>> Resent-From: <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-gjessing-taps-minset-00.txt has been
>> successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the IETF
>> repository.
>>
>> Name:                draft-gjessing-taps-minset
>> Revision:    00
>> Title:               A Minimal Set of Transport Services for TAPS
Systems
>> Document date:       2015-06-22
>> Group:               Individual Submission
>> Pages:               10
>> URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gjessing-taps-minset-
>00.txt
>> Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gjessing-taps-minset/
>> Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gjessing-taps-minset-00
>>
>>
>> Abstract:
>>   This draft will eventually recommend a minimal set of IETF Transport
>>   Services offered by end systems supporting TAPS, and give guidance on
>>   choosing among the available mechanisms and protocols.  As a starting
>>   point for discussion, it currently only gives an overview of some
>>   ways to categorize the set of transport services in the first TAPS
>>   document (version 4: draft-ietf-taps-transports-04), assuming that
>>   the eventual minimal set of transport services will be based on a
>>   similar form of categorization.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Taps mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to