Hi,
> On 05 Oct 2015, at 20:42, Aaron Falk <aaron.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Have others read this draft yet? It is clearly aimed at addressing charter > deliverable #1. Do other folks have an opinion on how well it helps the > group achieve the goals in our charter? Should we use this document in some > way? I'm looking for more input from the working group on how we should > proceed. > > My opinion: I am very mindful (& appreciative) of the significant effort by > Mirja and Brian and the other contributors on draft-ietf-taps-transports. +1 > The discussion around this doc has been very useful for clarifying (to me) > how difficult it can be to pull useful common abstractions out of the 30+ > years of transport technologies. Having been down this path for over a year, > I appreciate the fairly narrow approach draft-welzl-taps-transports and think > it may be the best chance for TAPS to succeed. > > Please share your views. You say you appreciate the "fairly narrow" approach of draft-welzl-taps-transports. This makes me wonder - maybe draft-welzl-taps-transports should only cover a subset of the transports in draft-ietf-taps-transports, based on what we can see in draft-ietf-taps-transports? (e.g. the eventual text on RTP in draft-ietf-taps-transports will probably not be a short list of features, which may indicate that RTP should not be included in draft-welzl-taps-transports). Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list Taps@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
