Hi, Benoit, On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-taps-01-00: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-taps/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Agree with Ben and Adam. I completely missed the subtleties of this > change. > > The "or" in the following excerpt really don't help > The following topics are out of scope for this Working Group: > - Extension, modification, or creation of transport or > security protocols > > What is out of scope: A, B, or maybe C or D? > > Not blocking this recharter, but please improve. > Agreed. I had stuffed more text into an existing bullet, and the new text would almost certainly be clearer in its own bullet, so separating into - Extension, modification, or creation of transport protocols - Extension, modification, or creation of security protocols Thanks, Spencer
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
