Very good. We can allocate a good portion of time for this discussion. BR
Zahed On 2018-03-01, 16:05, "Michael Welzl" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Mar 1, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: hi Zahed, Aaron, all, On 27 Feb 2018, at 18:28, Tommy Pauly <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Zahed & Aaron, We’ve posted the first of three new documents proposed for milestone 3, "An Architecture for Transport Services” (please go read it, everyone!): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-taps-arch https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pauly-taps-arch-00 The API and Implementation documents are forthcoming, and will be posted before the submission deadline. And now we have posted the second document (please go read it, everyone!): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-trammell-taps-interface. The document combines concepts of the Post Sockets, NEAT, and Socket Intents approaches to provide an interface to the architecture in the first document at the level of a language-independent, abstract asynchronous interface definition. We'd like 10-15 minutes after Tommy to build on the architecture and introduce the concepts. ISTM (though I haven't discussed with Tommy, Anna, and Micheal, the other editors) that the discussion time for these documents can probably be combined. Definitely, I say, as one of them! Cheers, Michael
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
