On Mar 18, 2018, 11:42 AM +0000, Aaron Falk <[email protected]>, wrote: > Thanks, Chris. One reply inline. > --aaron > On 18 Mar 2018, at 11:36, Christopher Wood wrote: > > Hi Aarron, > > > > Thanks for the feedback. Please see inline for responses. > > > > Best, > > Chris > > > > On Mar 17, 2018, 2:53 PM +0000, Aaron Falk <[email protected]>, wrote: > > > A few comments on the draft below. > > > --aaron > > > Introduction (sec 1): > > > I think it’s missing a statement describing why you chose this set of > > > protocols. You point out why you don’t include auth-only protocols but > > > why (only) these? > > No particular reason. Are there ones you think we should add? > The set looks a little random but I’m not knowledgable and perhaps that’s a > misimpression. Like, why include MinimalT? Does anyone use it? As far as I know, no. Though the design is sufficiently unique that we felt it best to include. Also, it shares features and inspired designs of newer ((more) widely used) protocols. (I’m speaking of 0-RTT handshakes here.)
Best, Chris
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
