On 07/25/2018 05:34 PM, Christopher Wood wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:05 AM Tommy Pauly <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, I'm inclined to agree—I think that having a unique address per >> connection shouldn't be the default; an application could certainly always >> set it if it wants to decrease linkability? > > Applications should not have to opt-in to better privacy. Decreased > linkability should be the default. So if doing this per-connection is > shown (not just believed) to be infeasible, then per-application is a > reasonable compromise.
Certainly, one address per application would be a more sensible default. However, I'm of the idea that whatever default one picks is the result of an analysys of tradeoffs, and not the other way around. -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
