On 08/07/2018 06:09 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Gorry,
> 
> Good points. Or it could be repositioned to a statement from the Internet 
> area to the upper layer working groups. “IPv6 Network layer addresses 
> properties and behaviors, please be aware.”
> 
> To me at least there seems to be a disconnect. Address properties, selection 
> and lifetimes are not dealt with well (if at all) by transport layer and 
> application implementations. 

FWIW, that's my take as well.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [email protected]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492




_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to