Glad to see rapid convergence on these comments. My turn for a nit:
On 21 Aug 2018, at 2:48, Michael Welzl wrote:
I'm not sure if you saw my suggestion about qualifying the reference to [I-D.ietf-taps-transport-security] as "Section 5 of [I-D.ietf-taps-transport-security]", but assuming that we're good on that one ...I saw it and agree. I thought that it's not necessary for the specific sentence that you ended up proposing, but now I agree that even in this sentence it's better. I'll update it to include "Section 5 of" just ahead of this reference.
The likelihood of an ID having it's sections renumbered is high enough that I don't think we should embed the section number in an RFC. I'd suggest using the section name as well in case one or both changes the reader is likely to make the connection: "Section 5 on Security Features and Transport Dependencies of ..."
--aaron
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
