Hi, Alissa,

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:22 PM Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-taps-minset-08: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-minset/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I was wondering about why this document is going for informational rather
> than
> proposed standard. I see that draft-ietf-taps-interface-01 has a normative
> reference to it, so this is effectively setting up a downref situation.
> That
> isn't necessarily a problem, but if the point is for this document to
> recommend
> an actual minimal set of transport services to be supported and exposed
> via the
> API specified in draft-ietf-taps-interface and other APIs, shouldn't that
> set
> be normative?
>

Understood. I'll need to talk about this with the TAPS chairs, and that
won't happen before the telechat tomorrow morning, but I will talk with the
TAPS chairs, and you'll have an answer.

(So, "do we need to discuss that on this telechat?", "no, the Discuss is
clear and actionable". - just to save wear and tear on the Secretariat!)

Thanks,

Spencer


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It seems like this document will be in need of updating once QUIC is
> published.
> Is the plan to publish this now and then publish an update next year? Why
> is
> that preferable to waiting and just publishing once?
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to