IMO the architecture is pretty solid, the unresolved issues currently under discussion are primarily interface details (a couple of which we should bring out of github to the list)...
Cheers, Brian > On 11 Jan 2019, at 17:35, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > > <nudge> Brian, Michael, Tommy: do we have any ‘unresolved architectural > topics’ to discuss next week? </n> > > > > On 9 Jan 2019, at 18:17, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Reminder that we have an interim call scheduled for next week. > > Since the last wg meeting there has been a fair amount of activity on GitHub > around the three interface docs. Can the authors expand on the ‘unresolved > architecture topics’ you’d like to discuss (preferably with a volunteer to > lead the discussion)? > > Also, are there any additional topics to add to the agenda? > > --aaron > > On 19 Nov 2018, at 10:05, IESG Secretary wrote: > The Transport Services (taps) Working Group will hold a virtual interim > meeting on 2019-01-15 from 11:00 to 13:00 America/New_York. > > Agenda: > Draft agenda: > 1. Unresolved architecture topics > 2. TAPS Registry proposal > 3. Use of GitHub > > Information about remote participation: > https://ietf.webex.com/meet/taps | Access code: 316 448 940 > _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
